Let's just boil it down to two groups for the sake of it now. I know
it's far more complicated and intricate than this, but for the sake
of this discussion we'll make it simple.

You've got people who believe in God and you have people who don't.
The people that don't believe in God are called humanists, they're
secular.

And they're the ones that want all the nativity scenes taken out of
the town square and they want any reference to religion taken out of
Christmas and all this even though it's a religious holiday, that's
who they are. They don't believe in God.

They don't believe in God for their own reasons but I think part of
it is fear. So you have people who believe in God and people that
don't. You have people who look at their pet cat and say, "God made
that," and they marvel. You look at humanists, secular humanists who
look at their pet cat, and say, "mongrel." They may love the cat,
but they don't care where it came from. They're not at all intrigued
where it came from, and they're not dazzled. They look at the
heavens and they just see specks of white. They do not see what is
obviously some force way beyond our comprehension, that's able to
assemble all this and put it together. They don't see it. They're
threatened by it for whatever reason. Other people do. Other people
live in constant wonderment at the creation of the universe and our
little speck of it.

Now, the people who have the fear, the people who are secular, who
don't think there's anything divine in anything, and there's a
reason for that, too. If there's no God it means who's supreme?
Human beings.

Human beings are supreme. Human beings set the rules, not some
Bible, not some unseen force that says what's right and wrong.
That's not for them, humans do this, humans decide, the humans
decide. If they want to worship a tree as a God, they can do it
without committing sin, and they won't be worried about it. So
humans are the focal point of everything. That's where global
warming comes from. We have the power to destroy the earth. We
didn't create it. We couldn't create it. We couldn't cause global
warming, but we couldn't stop global warming but to them we can
cause it.

All of the things that religious people invest in God, they invest
in human beings, and the world orients and evolves around human
beings. But to those of you on the left, you secular people, you're
not compelled to practice any religion, nobody is enforcing that on
you. The Schiavo case has nothing to do with anybody's right not to
practice religion. The Schiavo case had no effect on anybody
personally whatsoever. What Schiavo was about was Congress acting so
the federal courts would review whether her life was being taken in
violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause. It was
constitutional. Everything that happened on the right side in the
Schiavo case happened as a result of the Constitution, pure and
simple. Everything that happened on the left side of the Schiavo
case happened because of the fear on the left, on the secular side,
that the constitutional side would win.

Now, the discrimination. The liberals can act all afraid or angry or
put out that religious people or people of faith are taking over,
but I think the discrimination is the other way around.

If you and your community want to post the Ten Commandments in the
public square, guess what? You can't.

That's under attack. Tell me how the religious right is winning on
this?

If you in your community want school children to have the
opportunity to say the Pledge of Allegiance, that's under attack if
you put the word "God" in it. If you and your community want
religious symbols displayed in the public square, that's under
attack, and you probably are going to lose, till you fight back.

If you want to look at who's causing the problem, who's causing
discrimination, who's discrimination against whom, who's trying to
force what on whoever? You know, by putting a religious symbol and
nativity scene in a town square, you're not forcing that on anybody.
You're not saying that they're compelled to go revere it. They're
not even compelled to go look at it.

But the people on the secular left look at it, they get scared. They
don't even want to see it. It's like showing Dracula the cross. They
don't even want to see it, it scares them so much. And so just like
political correctness is designed to stop people from saying what
secular leftists don't want to hear, so are the attacks on religious
people so that secular leftists don't have to see what they don't
want to see because seeing what they don't want to see challenges
their weak belief system. Hearing what they don't want to hear
challenges their weakly structured intellectual belief system. So
the fear is on their side. Nobody is compelled to do anything.

Now, the Constitution -- and again this is for those of you on the
left -- the Constitution prevents a government religion being
imposed on you, as it was in England. It doesn't say that you're not
to be offered the opportunity to be religious, and it doesn't say
that you're not to be offended from religious symbols. There's no
constitutional right that you won't be offended. It's not there.
Now, give liberal judges enough time and it will be enshrined in the
Constitution, that we all have a right not to be offended and wait
till we start litigating that. But it's not there now. You do not
have a right not to be offended from religious symbols or references
to God. And so since you're not to be offended, you're not going to
allow yourselves to be offended, you have to purge from public
aspects of society all of these things that offend you, because you
have appropriated to yourselves a right not to be offended. But if
you don't want to practice religion then don't practice it.

I guarantee all of you secularists and leftists out there, you would
have hated America just as much prior to the time when the Supreme
Court in 1947 ruled that there's a wall of separation between church
and state.

Do you know that's the first time that it was actually ruled? We
think that it's in the Constitution, a wall of separation and it's
not there. There's no such thing. This is another example of how the
Constitution has been bastardized by liberalism. There's no such
thing in the Constitution. It was in 1947. It's not that long ago, a
Supreme Court decision that found a wall of separation between
church and state. A bunch of libs. So, you could go back, you libs
could go back prior to that, back to 1945, and you still would be
confronted with religious people, they were all over the place,
they've been all over this country ever since it was founded. So
even after the Supreme Court says, "There is a wall of separation
between church and state," you're still afraid, even though the
Supreme Court's given you what you want, the so-called wall, but
somehow the wall doesn't seem to be stopping the religious. So
you've got to jump over the wall and you've got to stop them
yourself when it comes to nativity scenes or whatever.

I still maintain that all this is about a total lack of
understanding and a fear that is felt, quivering in corners, folks,
these liberals do when they start, you know, imagining the strength
of faith. I mean what would you rather have faith in, you know, God
or yourself? You need both, but, you know, the people that only have
faith in themselves and their fellow human beings, imagine the
dismal, miserable existence that is. If you only have faith in your
fellow human beings and you look around the news every day what are
our fellow human beings doing to each other? It's not a pretty
sight.