For the Separation of Church and State Crowd


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2009 May
2007 July
2007 May
2007 April
2007 January
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 June
2006 May
2006 February
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January

My Links
EWTN
Dayton Right to Life Org.
Just the Facts.Org
My Yahoo Group
Toys for Tots 2004

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


free web counters
Disney Store

dmoz.org
Visit the Previous Site in the Gunny Ermey's USMC Web Ring!

Gunny Ermey's USMC Web Ring

Prev 5 ? List ? Join ? Rand ? Next 5

Visit the Next Site in the Gunny Ermey's USMC Web Ring!
  There are currently sites in this ring.  


For the Separation of Church and State Crowd
04.04.05 (10:30 am)   [edit]


I am wondering how the separation of church and state crowd thinks when it comes to common civil law, and “acts of God”?  How can insurance companies world wide operate with out the words “act(s) if God?  What do the average judge in the US define as an “act of God”.  If the ten commandments are not part civil code, then what is “act(s) of God” doing in our civil codes, and how could the phrase be replaced, so that all can understand the concept of an “act of God”?  An act of “Nature”, no that word originate in the pagan religions and is therefore a “religious word and concept”.  What words then be substituted for “act of God” and still have the same universal meaning at law?  I am not a civil lawyer, and would therefore be curious what the Juris Doctors in our group would think about this topic?

0 Comments
 
Your Name:


Your Comment: