Socialism is a Sin


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2009 May
2007 July
2007 May
2007 April
2007 January
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 June
2006 May
2006 February
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January

My Links
EWTN
Dayton Right to Life Org.
Just the Facts.Org
My Yahoo Group
Toys for Tots 2004

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


free web counters
Disney Store

dmoz.org
Visit the Previous Site in the Gunny Ermey's USMC Web Ring!

Gunny Ermey's USMC Web Ring

Prev 5 ? List ? Join ? Rand ? Next 5

Visit the Next Site in the Gunny Ermey's USMC Web Ring!
  There are currently sites in this ring.  


Socialism is a Sin
02.28.05 (10:46 am)   [edit]

Socialism, whether in the doctrinal or practical order, is a sin. In the doctrinal order, it is heresy, and consequently a mortal sin against faith. In the practical order, it is a sin against the commandments of God and of the Church, for it virtually transgresses all commandments. To be more precise: in the doctrinal order, Socialism strikes at the very foundations of faith; it is heresy radical and universal, because WITHIN IT ARE COMPREHENDED ALL HERESIES. In the practical order it is a radical and universal infraction of the divine law, since it sanctions and authorizes all infractions of that law.


Socialism is a heresy in the doctrinal order because heresy is the formal and obstinate denial of all Christian dogmas in general. It repudiates dogma altogether and substitutes opinion, whether that opinion be doctrinal or the negation of doctrine. Consequently, it denies every doctrine in particular. If we were to examine in detail all the doctrines or dogmas which, within the range of Socialism, have been denied, we would find every Christian dogma in one way or another rejected--from the dogma of the Incarnation to that of Infallibility.


Nonetheless Socialism is in itself dogmatic; and it is in the declaration of its own fundamental dogma, the absolute independence of the individual and the social reason, that it denies all Christian dogmas in general. Catholic dogma is the authoritative declaration of revealed truth--or a truth consequent upon Revelation--by its infallibly constituted exponent [the Pope]. This logically implies the obedient acceptance of the dogma on the part of the individual and of society. Socialism refuses to acknowledge this rational obedience and denies the authority. It asserts the sovereignty of the individual and social reason and enthrones Rationalism in the seat of authority. It knows no dogma except the dogma of self-assertion. Hence it is heresy, fundamental and radical, the rebellion of the human intellect against God.


It follows, therefore, that Socialism denies the absolute jurisdiction of Jesus Christ, who is God, over individuals and over society, and by consequence, repudiates the jurisdiction which God has delegated to the visible head of the Church over each and all of the faithful, whatever their condition or rank in life. Moreover, it denies the necessity of divine Revelation and the obligation of everyone to accept that Revelation under pain of eternal perdition. It denies the formal motive of faith, viz., the authority of God revealing, and admits only as much of revealed doctrine as it chooses or comprehends within its own narrow capacity. It denies the infallible magistracy of the Church and of the Pope, and consequently all the doctrines defined and taught by this divine authority. In short, it sets itself up as the measure and rule of faith and thus really shuts out Revelation altogether. It denies everything which it itself does not proclaim. It negates everything which it itself does not affirm. But not being able to affirm any truth beyond its own reach, it denies the possibility of any truth which it does not comprehend. The revelation of truth above human reason it therefore debars at the outset. The divinity of Jesus Christ is beyond its horoscope. The Church is outside its comprehension. The submission of human reason to the Word of Christ or its divinely constituted exponent [the Catholic Church, especially the Pope] is to it intolerable. It is, therefore, the radical and universal denial of all divine truth and Christian dogma, the primal type of all heresy, and the supreme rebellion against the authority of God and His Church. As with Lucifer, its maxim is, "I will not serve." Such is the general negation uttered by Socialism. From this radical denial of revealed truth in general naturally follows the denial of particular dogmas, in whole or in part (as circumstances present them in opposition to its rationalistic judgment). Thus, for instance, it denies the validity of faith by Baptism, when it admits or supposes the equality of any or all religious cults; it denies the sanctity of marriage when it sanctions so-called civil marriages; it denies the infallibility of the Roman Pontiff, when it refuses to accept as laws his official commands and teachings and subjects them to the scrutiny of its own intellect--not to assure itself of their authenticity, as is legitimate, but to sit in defiant judgment upon their contents.


When we come to the practical order, Socialism is radical immorality. Morality requires a standard and a guide for rational action; it postulates a hierarchy of ends, and therefore of order, within whose series there is a subordination of means to the attainment of an ultimate purpose. It therefore requires a principle or fundamental rule of all action, by which the subject of moral acts, the rational creature, determines his course and guides himself to the attainment of his end. In the moral order, the Eternal Reason alone can be that principle or fundamental rule of action, and this Eternal Reason is God. In the moral order, the created reason, with power to determine its course, must guide itself by the light of the Uncreated Reason, Who is the beginning and end of all things. The law, therefore, imposed by the Eternal Reason upon the creature must be the principle or rule of morality. Hence, obedience and submission in the moral order is an absolute requisite of morality. But Socialism has proclaimed the absurd principle of the absolute sovereignty of human reason; it denies any reason beyond itself and asserts its independence in the order of knowledge, and hence in the order of action or morality. Here we have morality without law, without order, freedom to do what one pleases, or what comes to the same thing, morality which is not morality, for morality implies the idea not only of direction, but also essentially demands that of restraint and limitation under the control of law. Socialism in the order of action is license, recognizing no principle or rule beyond itself.


We may then say of Socialism: in the order of ideas it is absolute error; in the order of facts it is absolute disorder. It is, therefore, in both cases a very grievous and deadly sin, for sin is rebellion against God in thought or in deed, the enthronement of the creature in the place of the Creator.


 

 


posted by: T (reply)
post date: 02.28.05 (12:08 pm)

Multifarious avenues of approach vie for attention as potential retorts to Mr. LynnKramer's lecherous rodomontades. Before I get moving here, let me point out that LynnKramer has no ground and no right to start wars, ruin the environment, invent diseases, and routinely do a hundred other things that kill people. No joke. It seems to me that he is both pompous and aberrant. Now there's a dangerous combination if I've ever seen one. One argument he makes is that bad things "just happen" (i.e., they're not caused by LynnKramer himself). That's just sheer arrant nonsense. The truth is that we should not concern ourselves with LynnKramer's putative virtue or vice. Rather, we should concern ourselves with our own welfare and the fact that debate with LynnKramer or a search for common ground is both a fruitless exercise and a suicidal strategy. Whatever weight we accord to that fact, we may be confident that LynnKramer sees life as a nugatory game without any rules. And I can say that with a clear conscience, because I cannot compromise with LynnKramer; he is without principles. I cannot reason with him; he is without reason. But I can warn him, and with a warning he must decidedly take to heart: I do not have the time, in one sitting, to go into the long answer as to why LynnKramer's bruta fulmina are as appealing as braces, acne, and a wooden leg at the senior prom. But the short answer is that his revenge fantasies have kept us separated for too long from the love, contributions, and challenges of our brothers and sisters in this wonderful adventure we share together -- life! If LynnKramer has spurred us to draw an accurate portrait of his ideological alignment, then LynnKramer may have accomplished a useful thing.

Consider the following, which I'll address in greater detail later: For the nonce, he is content to encourage individuals to disregard other people, to become fully self-absorbed. But when you least expect it, he will extinguish the voices of opposition. I don't mean to condemn anyone's beliefs, but if LynnKramer truly wanted to be helpful, he wouldn't introduce disease, ignorance, squalor, idleness, and want into affluent neighborhoods. Now that you've read the bulk of this letter, it should not come as a complete surprise that arrogant factionalism is merely a symptom of the disease called "Mr. LynnKramer-ism". However, this fact bears repeating again and again, until the words crack through the hardened exteriors of those who would rescue immoralism from the rubbish heap of history, dust it off, slap on a coat of cheap sophistry, and market it as new and improved. I am referring, of course, to the likes of LynnKramer.

Your Name:


Your Comment: