| Socialism is a Sin |
![]() Blog For Free! Archives Home 2009 May 2007 July 2007 May 2007 April 2007 January 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 June 2006 May 2006 February 2005 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2004 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January My Links EWTN Dayton Right to Life Org. Just the Facts.Org My Yahoo Group Toys for Tots 2004 tBlog My Profile Send tMail My tFriends My Images Sponsored Blog
|
posted by: T (reply) post date: 02.28.05 (12:08 pm) Multifarious avenues of approach vie for attention as potential retorts to Mr. LynnKramer's lecherous rodomontades. Before I get moving here, let me point out that LynnKramer has no ground and no right to start wars, ruin the environment, invent diseases, and routinely do a hundred other things that kill people. No joke. It seems to me that he is both pompous and aberrant. Now there's a dangerous combination if I've ever seen one. One argument he makes is that bad things "just happen" (i.e., they're not caused by LynnKramer himself). That's just sheer arrant nonsense. The truth is that we should not concern ourselves with LynnKramer's putative virtue or vice. Rather, we should concern ourselves with our own welfare and the fact that debate with LynnKramer or a search for common ground is both a fruitless exercise and a suicidal strategy. Whatever weight we accord to that fact, we may be confident that LynnKramer sees life as a nugatory game without any rules. And I can say that with a clear conscience, because I cannot compromise with LynnKramer; he is without principles. I cannot reason with him; he is without reason. But I can warn him, and with a warning he must decidedly take to heart: I do not have the time, in one sitting, to go into the long answer as to why LynnKramer's bruta fulmina are as appealing as braces, acne, and a wooden leg at the senior prom. But the short answer is that his revenge fantasies have kept us separated for too long from the love, contributions, and challenges of our brothers and sisters in this wonderful adventure we share together -- life! If LynnKramer has spurred us to draw an accurate portrait of his ideological alignment, then LynnKramer may have accomplished a useful thing. Consider the following, which I'll address in greater detail later: For the nonce, he is content to encourage individuals to disregard other people, to become fully self-absorbed. But when you least expect it, he will extinguish the voices of opposition. I don't mean to condemn anyone's beliefs, but if LynnKramer truly wanted to be helpful, he wouldn't introduce disease, ignorance, squalor, idleness, and want into affluent neighborhoods. Now that you've read the bulk of this letter, it should not come as a complete surprise that arrogant factionalism is merely a symptom of the disease called "Mr. LynnKramer-ism". However, this fact bears repeating again and again, until the words crack through the hardened exteriors of those who would rescue immoralism from the rubbish heap of history, dust it off, slap on a coat of cheap sophistry, and market it as new and improved. I am referring, of course, to the likes of LynnKramer. |
|
||||||||||||||