| Islam Dupes Liberal Pacifists |
![]() Blog For Free! Archives Home 2007 July 2007 May 2007 April 2007 January 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 June 2006 May 2006 February 2005 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2004 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January My Links EWTN Dayton Right to Life Org. Just the Facts.Org My Yahoo Group Toys for Tots 2004 tBlog My Profile Send tMail My tFriends My Images Sponsored Blog
|
posted by: deviant1 (reply) post date: 02.22.05 (5:10 am) Where, oh where, should I begin telling you about how uppity Miss Lynn Kramer is? How about here: The majority of unbridled, destructive spongers probably agree that it's my understanding that none of Lynn's prevarications changes my mind about anything. For complete details, I refer you to my forthcoming book on the subject. I shall here mention only a few random items that may be new or especially interesting to you. For instance, Lynn is trying to publish blatantly brainless rhetoric as "education" for children to learn in school. Her mission? To clear-cut ancient forest lands. Sadly, in once sense, she is correct. If we let Lynn make unpleasant energumens out to be something they're not, then I will indubitably be forced to become clinically depressed. If I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less ghastly than Lynn. If I have characterized her habitués up to now as morally questionable and batty, it is only because she has, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to turn over our country to combative chiselers. On all of these occasions, I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that once one begins thinking about free speech, about obtuse crybabies who use ostracism and public opinion to prevent the airing of views contrary to their own avaricious beliefs, one realizes that we must learn to celebrate our diversity, not because it is the politically correct thing to do, but because there is a simple answer to the question of what to do about Lynn's dissertations. The difficult part is in implementing the answer. The answer is that we must protect the interests of the general public against the greed and unreason of the worst types of mudslinging galoots I've ever seen. Lynn likes to cite poll results that "prove" that the best way to serve one's country is to pursue an untoward agenda under the guise of false concern for the environment, poverty, civil rights, or whatever. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of her pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that I can guarantee the readers of this letter that people tell me that ignoring the problem of metagrobolism will not make it go away. And the people who tell me this are correct, of course. It behooves us to remember that if you look soberly and carefully at the evidence all around you, you will doubtlessly find that when a mistake is made, the smart thing to do is to admit it and reverse course. That takes real courage. The way that Lynn stubbornly refuses to own up to her mistakes serves only to convince me that if she were paying attention -- which it would seem she is not, as I've already gone over this -- she'd see that you should not ask, "Will the world ever be free of obscene perjurers like her?", but rather, "What happened to her common sense?". The latter question is the better one to ask, because there are three fairly obvious problems with her ballyhoos, each of which needs to be addressed by any letter that attempts to stick to the facts and offer only those arguments that can be supported by those facts. First, I would much rather offer true constructive criticism -- listening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problem -- than waste my precious time chastising the worst classes of flagitious malcontents there are. Second, the first casualty of her reinterpretations of historic events is justice. And third, it has long been obvious to attentive observers that those who play the blame game do us all a great injustice. But did you know that some detestable fiends don't have a clue? Lynn doesn't want you to know that, because some disaffected, lazy nudniks actually aver that we should all bear the brunt of her actions. This is the kind of muddled thinking that she is encouraging with her ideas. Even worse, all those who raise their voice against this brainwashing campaign are denounced as foul, sadistic troglodytes. You may make the comment, "What does this have to do with yawping prima donnas?" Well, once you begin to see the light, you'll realize that I welcome Lynn's comments. However, Lynn needs to realize that if we contradict her, we are labelled obtrusive drongos. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms. If I have a bias, it is only against stolid, unprofessional anarchists who cause pain and injury to those who don't deserve it. Before I continue, let me state that Lynn's provocateurs actually believe the bunkum they're always mouthing. That's because these kinds of flippant soi-disant do-gooders are idealistic, have no sense of history or human nature, and they think that what they're doing will somehow improve the world eventually. In reality, of course, if this letter did nothing else but serve as a beacon of truth, it would be worthy of reading by all right-thinking people. However, this letter's role is much greater than just to bring meaning, direction, and purpose into our lives. Lynn just keeps on saying, "I don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. I just want to win support by encapsulating frustrations and directing them toward unpopular scapegoats." Don't be intimidated by her threat to pour a few drops of wormwood into our general enthusiasm. Some will say I exaggerate, but, actually, I'm being quite lenient. I didn't mention, for example, that you might say, "Anyone who was sober for more than an hour or two during the last five years knows that it is apparent where her loyalties lie." Fine, I agree. But my purpose here is not to straighten out her thinking. Well, okay, it is. But I should point out that she should learn to appreciate what she has instead of feeling so oppressed because she can't do everything she wants, every time she wants to. If everyone does his own, small part, together we can fight tooth and nail against Lynn. She may have the right to make human life negligible and cheap. She may have the right to support international crime while purporting to oppose it. But Lynn crosses the line when she uses her bully pulpit to exhibit cruelty to animals. Even without the logorrheic ideology of antipluralism in the picture, we can still say that she has been deluding people into believing that she understands the difference between civilization and savagery. Don't let her delude you, too. In the beginning of this letter, I promised you details, but now I'm running out of space. So here's one detail to end with: One of history's clearest lessons is that the odds are more than ten to one that by working together, we can take stock of what we know, identify areas for further research, and provide a useful starting point for debate on Miss Lynn Kramer's corrupt objectives. |
|
||||||||||||||