Islam Dupes Liberal Pacifists


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2009 May
2007 July
2007 May
2007 April
2007 January
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 June
2006 May
2006 February
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January

My Links
EWTN
Dayton Right to Life Org.
Just the Facts.Org
My Yahoo Group
Toys for Tots 2004

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


free web counters
Disney Store

dmoz.org
Visit the Previous Site in the Gunny Ermey's USMC Web Ring!

Gunny Ermey's USMC Web Ring

Prev 5 ? List ? Join ? Rand ? Next 5

Visit the Next Site in the Gunny Ermey's USMC Web Ring!
  There are currently sites in this ring.  


Islam Dupes Liberal Pacifists
02.21.05 (5:39 am)   [edit]
Lenin called them "useful idiots," and the label still applies. Now instead of doing the work of Stalin, these idiots are working for bin Laden, Zarqawi and the other slavering fanatics who are trying their hardest to end Western notions like freedom, equality and democracy. When will you morons realize you are playing right into the hands of those who are trying to destroy you?


Americans seem to have the memory span of the average sand flea. The vicious attack on American soil has been brushed aside by many. The fact that the enemy’s plan of attack was discovered, discussed, and published for all to see, also seems to have been dropped into the dumpster and forgotten.

Our soldiers discovered a document in Afghanistan, “The Al Qaeda Manual,” quite some time ago but Americans didn’t learn anything from it. This manual lays out in great detail the plans of the Islamic enemy, and everyday on the news anyone can see that Al Qaeda and other Islamic terrorists are following it to the letter and we are helping them.

Every organization has a “mission statement” and terrorists are no different. What is their goal? They have only one: “The overthrow of the godless regimes and their replacement with an Islamic regime.” The terrorists have some other minor goals, but they are all in place to achieve the main goal of world domination. In case no one has noticed, Islam considers America one of those “Godless regimes.”

One way to accomplish this goal is “Assassinating enemy personnel as well as foreign tourists.” Of course, with Islamic terrorists, “enemy personnel” can be anyone from a Jewish toddler to an Iraqi humanitarian or a Dutch filmmaker. In short, the enemy is anyone not a Muslim who believes the world is destined to be ruled by Islam.

My personal favorite item from the mission statement is “Spreading rumors and writing statements that instigate people against the enemy.” Does the overblown behavior of a few at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq come to mind? The saddest thing for America is that it was our own media that did the terrorists' dirty work for them. The New York Times had that story on its front page for over 48 days. Who needs al-Jazeera when you have The New York Times?

In lesson two, it is established that members must be Muslim. How can an unbeliever do Allah’s work? It is also put in black and white that all must be willing to be martyrs for the cause. “He [the member] has to be willing to do the work and undergo martyrdom for the purpose of achieving the goal and establishing the religion of majestic Allah on earth.” There is that reminder of the goal of Islamics: establishing the religion of majestic Allah on Earth. Are you listening, Senator Kennedy? Do you hear the words of the enemy, Representative Pelosi? Bin Laden and company plan a hostile takeover of your jobs.

Lesson four tells the enemy how to seek out and find the proper living quarters. Terrorists need to blend with the locals, find good places to spy, and store weapons. Their apartments should be near the intended target so they can study movements and security and achieve the best results from the attack. Terrorists are taught to get the most blood for their buck.

Lessons five through nine go into great detail about member safety, security, buying weapons, communications, and all the mundane but necessary items for waging war.

Chapters 11 and 12 give direction on espionage of both covert and open methods. How can a good Muslim live among the beasts and stay a good Muslim? After all, the good terrorist must blend in and not bring attention to himself. Dropping to his knees five times a day to pray would be noticed. He must dress and act as the people around him and as disgusting as he may find it, he must do that for the cause. The terrorist-in-training is given example after example of how Mohammed himself used spies of all kinds to achieve his goals of looting and pillaging. Allah will understand. This behavior is not seen as “sinning” but suffering for the greater good. All will be forgiven.

Even the expert Islamic terrorist will find himself in the hands of the infidel on occasion. What to do? Knowing that the foolish, liberal West will fall all over itself to be fair with an enemy that doesn’t know the meaning of the word “fair,” the terrorist will be given a trial. When the trial begins, the first thing the good terrorist must do is claim to have been tortured. “At the beginning of the trial, once more the brothers must insist on proving that torture was inflicted on them by State Security [investigators] before the judge.” Very vocal complaints of torture should be given to the judge and shouted to any media that is within earshot, and the names of prison guards should be memorized and repeated. These names should be passed on to the other “brothers” in prison so that they can use them as well.

How well the enemy knows us! While Islamic terrorists kidnap, torture, behead, execute, and rape with wild abandon in the name of Islam, they know liberal Americans will howl for the head of any and all who are accused of mistreating one of these little darlings by making him stand for eight hours in a cold room or be blindfolded for a day.

When a guard gets bitten by a prisoner and smacks the man doing the biting, accusations of mistreatment are heard and the liberals, pacifists, and American Civil Liberty Union screams for the head of the guard.

When a Marine kills two terrorists who are coming toward him and they refuse to stop when ordered, it is the Marine who is the criminal, not the two dead men who had just carried out a terror attack on our troops. Did they have suicide vests on? Did they have hidden weapons? No one knew. These two terrorists had just killed. Were they following the orders in their handbook and becoming martyrs? That is the dream of all Islamic terrorists. Remember, they have those 72 virgins waiting for them in paradise.

When a Marine shoots a man playing dead after seeing his best friend killed the day before by someone using the same tactic, the liberal media wants his head on a pike. The video is shown over and over again on the American cable channels. Again, who needs the enemy press when our own media and press outlets carry out the terrorists' plans to the letter?

When will this madness end? When will Americans realize that we are at war? When will we realize that our very lives and freedom are in serious jeopardy from an enemy that follows no rules, knows no bounds, will kill anyone in its way, and is expert at using our own kindness and gullibility against us?

The Islamic terrorists have given us a roadmap to follow and we ignore it and play right into their hands. As to our media, had today’s media been in place prior to D-Day, the headline of The New York Times on June 5, 1944 would have been: “Largest military force ever assembled ready to land on the beaches at Normandy tomorrow!” After all, we wouldn’t want to give our soldiers an unfair advantage.
 


posted by: deviant1 (reply)
post date: 02.22.05 (5:10 am)

Where, oh where, should I begin telling you about how uppity Miss Lynn Kramer is? How about here: The majority of unbridled, destructive spongers probably agree that it's my understanding that none of Lynn's prevarications changes my mind about anything. For complete details, I refer you to my forthcoming book on the subject. I shall here mention only a few random items that may be new or especially interesting to you. For instance, Lynn is trying to publish blatantly brainless rhetoric as "education" for children to learn in school. Her mission? To clear-cut ancient forest lands. Sadly, in once sense, she is correct. If we let Lynn make unpleasant energumens out to be something they're not, then I will indubitably be forced to become clinically depressed.

If I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less ghastly than Lynn. If I have characterized her habitués up to now as morally questionable and batty, it is only because she has, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to turn over our country to combative chiselers. On all of these occasions, I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that once one begins thinking about free speech, about obtuse crybabies who use ostracism and public opinion to prevent the airing of views contrary to their own avaricious beliefs, one realizes that we must learn to celebrate our diversity, not because it is the politically correct thing to do, but because there is a simple answer to the question of what to do about Lynn's dissertations. The difficult part is in implementing the answer. The answer is that we must protect the interests of the general public against the greed and unreason of the worst types of mudslinging galoots I've ever seen. Lynn likes to cite poll results that "prove" that the best way to serve one's country is to pursue an untoward agenda under the guise of false concern for the environment, poverty, civil rights, or whatever. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of her pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that I can guarantee the readers of this letter that people tell me that ignoring the problem of metagrobolism will not make it go away. And the people who tell me this are correct, of course.

It behooves us to remember that if you look soberly and carefully at the evidence all around you, you will doubtlessly find that when a mistake is made, the smart thing to do is to admit it and reverse course. That takes real courage. The way that Lynn stubbornly refuses to own up to her mistakes serves only to convince me that if she were paying attention -- which it would seem she is not, as I've already gone over this -- she'd see that you should not ask, "Will the world ever be free of obscene perjurers like her?", but rather, "What happened to her common sense?". The latter question is the better one to ask, because there are three fairly obvious problems with her ballyhoos, each of which needs to be addressed by any letter that attempts to stick to the facts and offer only those arguments that can be supported by those facts. First, I would much rather offer true constructive criticism -- listening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problem -- than waste my precious time chastising the worst classes of flagitious malcontents there are. Second, the first casualty of her reinterpretations of historic events is justice. And third, it has long been obvious to attentive observers that those who play the blame game do us all a great injustice. But did you know that some detestable fiends don't have a clue? Lynn doesn't want you to know that, because some disaffected, lazy nudniks actually aver that we should all bear the brunt of her actions. This is the kind of muddled thinking that she is encouraging with her ideas. Even worse, all those who raise their voice against this brainwashing campaign are denounced as foul, sadistic troglodytes. You may make the comment, "What does this have to do with yawping prima donnas?" Well, once you begin to see the light, you'll realize that I welcome Lynn's comments. However, Lynn needs to realize that if we contradict her, we are labelled obtrusive drongos. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms. If I have a bias, it is only against stolid, unprofessional anarchists who cause pain and injury to those who don't deserve it. Before I continue, let me state that Lynn's provocateurs actually believe the bunkum they're always mouthing. That's because these kinds of flippant soi-disant do-gooders are idealistic, have no sense of history or human nature, and they think that what they're doing will somehow improve the world eventually. In reality, of course, if this letter did nothing else but serve as a beacon of truth, it would be worthy of reading by all right-thinking people. However, this letter's role is much greater than just to bring meaning, direction, and purpose into our lives. Lynn just keeps on saying, "I don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. I just want to win support by encapsulating frustrations and directing them toward unpopular scapegoats."

Don't be intimidated by her threat to pour a few drops of wormwood into our general enthusiasm. Some will say I exaggerate, but, actually, I'm being quite lenient. I didn't mention, for example, that you might say, "Anyone who was sober for more than an hour or two during the last five years knows that it is apparent where her loyalties lie." Fine, I agree. But my purpose here is not to straighten out her thinking. Well, okay, it is. But I should point out that she should learn to appreciate what she has instead of feeling so oppressed because she can't do everything she wants, every time she wants to.

If everyone does his own, small part, together we can fight tooth and nail against Lynn. She may have the right to make human life negligible and cheap. She may have the right to support international crime while purporting to oppose it. But Lynn crosses the line when she uses her bully pulpit to exhibit cruelty to animals. Even without the logorrheic ideology of antipluralism in the picture, we can still say that she has been deluding people into believing that she understands the difference between civilization and savagery. Don't let her delude you, too. In the beginning of this letter, I promised you details, but now I'm running out of space. So here's one detail to end with: One of history's clearest lessons is that the odds are more than ten to one that by working together, we can take stock of what we know, identify areas for further research, and provide a useful starting point for debate on Miss Lynn Kramer's corrupt objectives.



Your Name:


Your Comment: