| The Swiss Rip Chirac a New One |
![]() Blog For Free! Archives Home 2007 July 2007 May 2007 April 2007 January 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 June 2006 May 2006 February 2005 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2004 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January My Links EWTN Dayton Right to Life Org. Just the Facts.Org My Yahoo Group Toys for Tots 2004 tBlog My Profile Send tMail My tFriends My Images Sponsored Blog
|
posted by: JonC (reply) post date: 01.28.05 (6:17 am) Urgent: consult a psychiatrist , your case needs a serious therapy, there are asylums for Lynnkrammer! Inquire! posted by: LynnKramer (reply) post date: 01.28.05 (7:29 am) To JonC Dans toutes mes lettres, j'essaye plus dur que toute autre chose de me rendre clair. J'essaye d'énoncer des choses aussi simplement et clairement que je bidon, parce que je trouve ce qui est la meilleure manière de convaincre mes lecteurs qui dans la terminologie légale, M. JonC est coupable du veri de suppressio ou de la "dissimulation de la vérité". Avant que je commence, laissez-moi précisent qu'un léopard ne peut pas changer ses taches. En raison de celui, il n'étonne pas qu'un point central de systèmes de croyance de M. JonC's est la notion que M. JonC peut dépasser la nature. Peut-être il devrait tenir compte de quelques nouvelles données et revisiter cette notion. Je pense qu'il constaterait que beaucoup de personnes sont incrédules quand je leur dis qu'il prévoit à la gaufre sur toutes les questions. "comment pourrait M. JonC être si désagréable?", ils me demandent. "ce ne semble pas possible." Bien, il est décidément possible, et maintenant j'expliquerai exactement comment des plans de M. JonC le faire. Mais d'abord, vous devez vous rendre compte que ses mettre-bas ne peuvent pas se tenir sur leur propre mérite. C'est pourquoi ils dépendent des artifices raffinés et des histoires explicatives pour nous convaincre que M. JonC peut absorber le mana en dévorant les cerveaux de ses nemeses'. Presque sans exception, je défie M. JonC de préciser n'importe quel texte dans cette lettre qui propose cela qui fait la chose à la mode est plus importante que la vie ou la liberté. Elle n'est pas là. Il n'y a ni un conseil ni une suggestion d'une telle chose. Si, aujourd'hui, le recommander de son guerre-âme peut l'inciter à prendre à degré de solvabilité pour d'autres des accomplissements, alors imaginer, si vous pouvez, comment cette même âme s'exprimera par M. JonC thousandfold-plus-insipide de demain. Vous ne devriez pas le laisser vous intimider. Vous ne devriez pas le laisser vous pousser autour. Nous sommes ceux qui ont raison, pas M. JonC. Imaginez un monde en lequel il pourrait rendre la vie moins plaisante pour nous toutes les fois qu'il s'est senti comme lui. S'il y a une règle, et il continue à faire des exceptions à cette règle, alors quel bon est la règle ? Je veux dire, si on pourrait obtenir un Ph.D. dans Mandarinism, il serais le premier dans la ligne pour avoir un. Envoyer les tightwads insolents des vacances de safari au lieu de birching publiquement les n'a jamais été quelque chose que j'ai voulu faire. Jamais. Beaucoup les choses que j'ai parlées dans cette lettre sont évidents. Nous tous savons qu'ils sont vrais. Mais il est toujours que nous les disent, parce que presque chaque discussion de matérialisme ignore l'importance critique des entreprises anormales de M. JonC's. In all my letters, I try harder than anything else to make myself clear. I try to state things as simply and unambiguously as I can, because I find that that's the best way to convince my readers that in legal terminology, M. JonC is guilty of suppressio veri or "concealment of truth". Before I begin, let me point out that a leopard can't change its spots. In view of that, it is not surprising that a central point of M. JonC's belief systems is the notion that M. JonC can override nature. Perhaps he should take some new data into account and revisit that notion. I think he'd find that many people are incredulous when I tell them that he intends to waffle on all the issues. "How could M. JonC be so unsavory?", they ask me. "It doesn't seem possible." Well, it is decidedly possible, and now I'll explain exactly how M. JonC plans to do it. But first, you need to realize that his put-downs cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that M. JonC can absorb mana by devouring his nemeses' brains. Almost without exception, I challenge M. JonC to point out any text in this letter that proposes that doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty. It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing. If, today, the urge of his war-soul can prompt him to take credit for others' accomplishments, then imagine, if you can, how that same soul will express itself through the thousandfold-more-tasteless M. JonC of tomorrow. You shouldn't let him intimidate you. You shouldn't let him push you around. We're the ones who are right, not M. JonC. Imagine a world in which he could make life less pleasant for us whenever he felt like it. If there's a rule, and he keeps making exceptions to that rule, then what good is the rule? I mean, if one could get a Ph.D. in Mandarinism, he would be the first in line to have one. To send insolent tightwads on safari holidays instead of publicly birching them has never been something that I wanted to do. Never. Many the things I've talked about in this letter are obvious. We all know they're true. But still it's necessary for us to say them, because almost every discussion of materialism ignores the critical importance of M. JonC's aberrant undertakings. posted by: shayno (reply) post date: 01.28.05 (10:16 pm) allow me to offer this opionion in the style you seem to prefer: blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah grotty blah blah blah. blah blah blah blah blah blah blah sniffish blah. yada yada yada thinga thinga dinga, yet even blah blah blah rama dama ding dong. lynn blah blah yada yada kramer yada yada thinga isa blah blah blah nuta. further more, blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah grotty blah blah blah. blah blah blah blah blah blah blah sniffish blah. yada yada yada thinga thinga dinga, yet even blah blah blah rama dama ding dong. lynn blah blah yada yada kramer yada yada thinga isa blah blah blah nuta. and yet, blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah grotty blah blah blah. blah blah blah blah blah blah blah sniffish blah. yada yada yada thinga thinga dinga, yet even blah blah blah rama dama ding dong. lynn blah blah yada yada kramer yada yada thinga isa blah blah blah nuta. further more, blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah grotty blah blah blah. blah blah blah blah blah blah blah sniffish blah. yada yada yada thinga thinga dinga, yet even blah blah blah rama dama ding dong. lynn blah blah yada yada kramer yada yada thinga isa blah blah blah nuta. i hope that was concise but to reitterate blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah grotty blah blah blah. blah blah blah blah blah blah blah sniffish blah. yada yada yada thinga thinga dinga, yet even blah blah blah rama dama ding dong. lynn blah blah yada yada kramer yada yada thinga isa blah blah blah nuta. further more, blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah grotty blah blah blah. blah blah blah blah blah blah blah sniffish blah. yada yada yada thinga thinga dinga, yet even blah blah blah rama dama ding dong. lynn blah blah yada yada kramer yada yada thinga isa blah blah blah nuta. and yet, blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah grotty blah blah blah. blah blah blah blah blah blah blah sniffish blah. yada yada yada thinga thinga dinga, yet even blah blah blah rama dama ding dong. lynn blah blah yada yada kramer yada yada thinga isa blah blah blah nuta. further more, blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah grotty blah blah blah. blah blah blah blah blah blah blah sniffish blah. yada yada yada thinga thinga dinga, yet even blah blah blah rama dama ding dong. lynn blah blah yada yada kramer yada yada thinga isa blah blah blah nuta. posted by: JonC (reply) post date: 01.28.05 (11:54 pm) Reply to: shayno excellent shayno, I join your thoughts!!! Peace my friend, Jon posted by: WhyNot (reply) post date: 01.29.05 (9:30 am) Reply to: shayno LOL posted by: jimmytherighteous (reply) post date: 01.31.05 (10:35 pm) Reply to: shayno Wow, that was perfect! By the way, I'd like to point out to LynnKramer that the United States has plenty of laws that are regarded as being "extraterritorial" and thus impinging upon the sovereignty of other nations. Examples? The Helms-Burton Act, to start with. I'll give you more if you need further explanation. |
|
||||||||||||||