GOVERNORS WORRIED ABOUT LOSING THEIR GUARD TROOPS TO IRAQ WAR


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2007 July
2007 May
2007 April
2007 January
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 June
2006 May
2006 February
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January

My Links
EWTN
Dayton Right to Life Org.
Just the Facts.Org
My Yahoo Group
Toys for Tots 2004

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


free web counters
Disney Store

dmoz.org
Visit the Previous Site in the Gunny Ermey's USMC Web Ring!

Gunny Ermey's USMC Web Ring

Prev 5 ? List ? Join ? Rand ? Next 5

Visit the Next Site in the Gunny Ermey's USMC Web Ring!
  There are currently sites in this ring.  


GOVERNORS WORRIED ABOUT LOSING THEIR GUARD TROOPS TO IRAQ WAR
07.23.04 (5:20 am)   [edit]
One of the traditional means that state governors have had to respond to natural disasters and other emergencies is the National Guard.

Now, however, with 40% of the occupation force in
Iraq being made up of reserve and National Guard troops, some governors are worried that they may not have the resources they need to respond to those kinds of emergencies, and they made their concerns known at the National Governors Association meeting, this past weekend in Seattle, in a meeting with Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness David Chu and commander of U.S. Northern Command Gen. Ralph Eberhardt.

"This has had a huge impact," said Washington Gov. Gary Locke. 62% of Washington's National Guard is deployed, including the majority of the best-trained firefighters, just as the forest fire season is getting under way.

A spokesman for Idaho Gov. Dirk Kempthorne noted that, in the past, the state has been able to call on the National Guard, but "We may not be able to call on these soldiers for firefighting capabilities," this year, because they simply aren't there.

As of July 21, a total of 153,599 reservists and National Guardsmen are on active duty, of which, 126,856 are Army Reserve and Army National Guard.

[source: Seattle Times, July 21; DoD press briefing, July 21]

PENTAGON CONSIDERING EXTENDING NATIONAL GAURDSMEN BEYOND 24 MONTHS.

The Defense Department is reportedly considering
extending the mobilization of National Guard soldiers beyond the federal limit of 24 months, as the first groups of soldiers activated after the 9/11 attacks near that limit.

The first soldiers effected would be about 450 from the Arkansas National Guard who are in Iraq as part of the 39th Infantry Brigade, but it could soon be extended to thousands of others.

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld denied, during a press briefing this afternoon, that there were plans to extend anyone beyond the 24 months, but left the possibility open when he added, "the country's at war," and "the facts on the ground will determine what we do...."

0 Comments
 
Your Name:


Your Comment: