The Jackals of Death and the Hard Core Choir of the Leftists


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2007 July
2007 May
2007 April
2007 January
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 June
2006 May
2006 February
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January

My Links
EWTN
Dayton Right to Life Org.
Just the Facts.Org
My Yahoo Group
Toys for Tots 2004

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


free web counters
Disney Store

dmoz.org
Visit the Previous Site in the Gunny Ermey's USMC Web Ring!

Gunny Ermey's USMC Web Ring

Prev 5 ? List ? Join ? Rand ? Next 5

Visit the Next Site in the Gunny Ermey's USMC Web Ring!
  There are currently sites in this ring.  


The Jackals of Death and the Hard Core Choir of the Leftists
06.07.04 (11:08 am)   [edit]
Try this:
Search the user/blog searh function here at tblog for "Reagan". When the list comes up, you can judge for yourselves who the jackals of the Death Cult are. They reveal themselves by their gloating tone, and gleeful disrespect in the titles on their blogs concerning the death of a former President.


Remember the bloggers and keep this behavior in mind as you read or reread any of their past or present works. Forewarned is forearmed. Laugh while you can monkeyboys, history will be more kindly towards him than you.
 


posted by: WinstonSmith (reply)
post date: 06.07.04 (11:20 am)

If you are against the "Cult of Death" why aren't you oposed to Bush's Death Cult in Iraq, that even the Pope condemned the War Criminal Bush for??? ... You sound hypocritical... P.S. Because people criticize Reagan doesn't mean they are 'gloating'-- that is propaganda on your part, and not very smart propaganda at that.



posted by: WinstonSmith (reply)
post date: 06.07.04 (11:21 am)

"monkeyboys"??? that's real "kind" isn't it??? you folks on the right sure are blind to your own hypocrisy aren't you!!!



posted by: newbie (reply)
post date: 06.07.04 (11:39 am)

Please tell me where the "gloating tone, and gleeful disrepect" is in this Tblog: http://www.tblog.com/templates/index.php?bid=WinstonSmith&static=197242

Your insulting use of "monkeyboys" is not consistent with your own preachy, whiny tone about kindness.



posted by: WhyNot (reply)
post date: 06.07.04 (2:13 pm)

Reply to: WinstonSmith

"If you are against the "Cult of Death" why aren't you oposed to Bush's Death Cult in Iraq...."

Couldn't put it better, Winston - how come you have this way with words, you lucky bastard :-)

Ok, Lynn:

Why are you such a bigot? Why is that you preach love and tolerance on one hand (or claim to, at least) - on the grounds of your religious beliefs - and yet deny the most atrocious human rights violations have (and are still) happened in the world, on the grounds your Church/beliefs says it's ok? Is it a hangover from 15th century European Inquisition days?

Worse still, how can you conciliate the poor old man (the Pope) repeatedly condemning Bush's fascist and murderous deeds with your own religious views?

Lastly, why on earth is the fact a man was once a US president should make him immune from any criticism? Do you think America is sacred and it can do no wrong? Do you think only America is right all the time, and any other country is by definition wrong? Do you think THE AMERICAN PRESIDENT is another Pope yet, and the direct and unfailable angel from God?

That IS excatly the kind of talk ppl in my own country used to believe for centuries. The king was the Envoy of God. He could do no wrong. If he murdered ppl by the million, it was all in the name of God's mysteriously fucked ways. Somehow, thank goodness, we've progressed from that imbecillic viewpoint. But apparently, you would like the US to jump back 5 centuries and adopt the same inane views, right?

ALL heads of state in France/Germany/US etc, whether kings, presidents or whatever, were but simple human beings. Some were pretty good (few, unfortunately), lots were total assholes, and most were in between. I see nothing wrong in denouncing Général De Gaulle as a fascist asshole in the later years of his ruling France and butchering the north African continent, even if he was a pretty good guy in his early days during WW2. Similarly I don't see anything wrong with saying Raegan was mostly a corrupt, ignorant and stupid asshole as a whole. I'm sure he did a few thing right, but by and large he's certainly not a leader America should proud to have had. Some of your presidents were better than others, thank goodness, some were the pits, and most were in between. What is you big problem with judging them as men? Why do you infer that, since they were PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES, he is inherently a saint and must be revered as such?

What do you sniff on a daily basis?


Your Name:


Your Comment: