| Will the Real Ratzinger Please Stand Up?! |
 Blog For Free! Archives Home 2007 July 2007 May 2007 April 2007 January 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 June 2006 May 2006 February 2005 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2004 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January My Links EWTN Dayton Right to Life Org. Just the Facts.Org My Yahoo Group Toys for Tots 2004 tBlog My Profile Send tMail My tFriends My Images Sponsored Blog
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
In 1992 Ratzinger Wrote in the French Preface to Gamber's Book Trashing the New Order That the Novus Ordo Service of 1969 Was a "Fabricated Liturgy"
In 2007's Summorum Pontificum He Now Claims that They Are One and the Same
Even a Simpleton Can See What a Fabrication of His Own Benedict-Ratzinger Is Making!
Are you getting the idea the Benedict-Ratzinger is making up his teaching as he goes along? He is quickly earning the reputation of being "The Flip-Flop Pope." The latest proof is his Great "Motu" Mass Hoax, in which he contradicts statements on the history of the Mass that he made just 15 years ago.
In 1992 Ratzinger wrote a preface for the French edition, La Réform du Rite Romain, of Msgr. Klaus Gamber's 1979 Die Reform der Römischen Liturgie: Vorgeschichte und Problematik [The Reform of the Roman Liturgy: Its Problems and Background]. Gamber, highly praised as a liturgical scholar by Ratzinger at the time, wrote his book ten years after the introduction of Freemason Bugnini's New Order service in 1969 and absolutely devastated all the Novus Ordo frauds: a turned around table as an altar, Mass turned toward the congregation, the phony "Hippolytan" canon, the Aramaic ruse on the words of consecration, and many others. Ratzinger wrote at that time:
What happened after the [Vatican II] Council was something else entirely: in the place of liturgy as the fruit of development came fabricated liturgy. We abandoned the organic, living process of growth and development over centuries, and replace it -- as in a manufacturing process -- with a fabrication, a banal on-the-spot product.
In 1992 Ratzinger was clearing saying that the Novus Ordo service had no historical connection or resemblance to the Traditional Latin Mass that preceded it. The Novus Ordo service, Ratzinger then said, was a "fabrication" (the same word in his French as in English), the very word that the TRADITIO Network has consistently used of the Novus Ordo Protestant-Masonic-Pagan service.
On July 7, 2007, in Summorum pontificum Benedict-Ratzinger did a volte-face, an about face, so brazen that it reminds us of the pagan Roman god Janus, who was depicted as having two faces turned opposite one another. Here is what he says in 2007:
It is not appropriate to speak of these two versions of the Roman Missal [1962 and 1969] as if they were "two Rites." Rather, it is a matter of a twofold use of one and the same rite.
Confronted with these two entirely contradictory statements about the history of the Mass, showing up Benedict-Ratzinger to be Janus-faced, we Fathers here are having trouble keeping a straight face! The Great "Motu" Mass Hoax is really quite laughable, especially since it has caught so many of the ignoscenti "talking-heads" so flat-footed, aptly to mix a metaphor.