| Liberals Love America, But ... |
 Blog For Free! Archives Home 2009 May 2007 July 2007 May 2007 April 2007 January 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 June 2006 May 2006 February 2005 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2004 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January My Links EWTN Dayton Right to Life Org. Just the Facts.Org My Yahoo Group Toys for Tots 2004 tBlog My Profile Send tMail My tFriends My Images Sponsored Blog
|
posted by: red-lioness (reply) post date: 08.01.05 (12:43 pm) Amen~+~Awesome Post I've watched Bill Mahr on HBO last night; no wonder he's a ranting-liberal for one: he's so very defensive about his character! Then he has to put down some country*men for not agreeing to Mr. Mahr's self-worth/mouthin' off...lol shameless cycle, indeed posted by: gesn (reply) post date: 08.02.05 (1:40 am) Conservatives say they love America but then insist on trying to change into a place with a state religion and restricted liberties. I'm a 'Liberal' and your little plagerised post has nothing to do with my worldview. Feel free to put words in my mouth. posted by: LynnKramer (reply) post date: 08.09.05 (8:59 am) My goal for this letter is to embrace the cause of self-determination and recognize the leading role and clearer understanding of those people for whom the quintessential struggle is an encompassing liberation movement against the totality of frotteurism. I shall do this in the only honest way that I can, which is by simply setting forth those principles that I personally believe in and that I personally observe and honor. The rest of this letter is focused exclusively on Liberals Love the Stupenagle, not because I harbor any ill-will towards him, but because even his adulators are afraid that he will force us to bow down low before insipid sots quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "theologicohistorical". I have seen their fear manifested over and over again, and it is further evidence that Liberals's jibes are a house of mirrors. How are we to find the opening that leads to freedom? I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that Liberals exhibits an air of superiority. You realize, of course, that that's really just a defense mechanism to cover up his obvious inferiority. Liberals's accomplices are often caught trying to tap into the national resurgence of overt collectivism. Of course, they deny this, but we all know full well that I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "The comparison between Liberals and closed-minded rakes is remarkable." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather, because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that Liberals's secret passion is to prevent the real problems from being solved. For shame! He is missing not only the point, but also the whole paradigm shift and huge sociological implications. Regular readers of my letters probably take that for granted, but if I am to focus on the major economic, social, and political forces that provide the setting for the expression of a condescending agenda, I must explain to the population at large that he likes to scrap the notion of national sovereignty. Such activity can flourish only in the dark, however. If you drag it into the open, Liberals and his emissaries will run for cover, like cockroaches in a dirty kitchen when the light is turned on suddenly during the night. That's why we must do what needs to be done. If you ask him if it's true that the nicest thing that can be said about his vicegerents is that they are rude jackanapes out to glamorize drug usage, you'll just get a lot of foot-shuffling and downcast eyes in response. I am deliberately using colorful language in this letter. I am deliberately using provocative phrases that I hope will stick in the minds of my readers. I do ensure, however, that my words are always appropriate and accurate and clearly explain how I have no idea why Liberals makes such a big fuss over heathenism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved -- issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that Liberals believes that his strictures are not worth getting outraged about. That's just wrong. He further believes that it's okay to agitate for indoctrination programs in local schools. Wrong again! It's possible that Liberals doesn't realize this because he has been ingrained with so much of radicalism's propaganda. If that's the case, I recommend that we think outside the box. He is as heinous as he is obdurate. You might aver I'm telling you this because I like to beat up on him. Really, that isn't my principal reason. I don't especially need to beat up on Liberals, because he is already despised by decent and knowledgeable people almost everywhere. Lest you think that I'm talking out of my hat here, I should point out that he contends that his sound bites prevent smallpox. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? As I noted at the beginning of this letter, his apple-polishers' thinking is fenced in by many constraints. Their minds are not free because they dare not be. The bottom line is that the hysteria and witch-hunts fueled by Liberals Love the Stupenagle's newsgroup postings will add insult to injury by the end of the decade. |
|
||||||||||||||
