O'Connor successor will determine if partial-birth abortion remains legal


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2009 May
2007 July
2007 May
2007 April
2007 January
2006 October
2006 September
2006 August
2006 June
2006 May
2006 February
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 August
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January

My Links
EWTN
Dayton Right to Life Org.
Just the Facts.Org
My Yahoo Group
Toys for Tots 2004

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog


free web counters
Disney Store

dmoz.org
Visit the Previous Site in the Gunny Ermey's USMC Web Ring!

Gunny Ermey's USMC Web Ring

Prev 5 ? List ? Join ? Rand ? Next 5

Visit the Next Site in the Gunny Ermey's USMC Web Ring!
  There are currently sites in this ring.  


O'Connor successor will determine if partial-birth abortion remains legal
07.12.05 (3:15 am)   [edit]

"Five years ago, five justices of the Supreme Court, including Justice O'Connor, ruled that Roe v. Wade allows an abortionist to perform a partial-birth abortion any time he sees a 'health' benefit, even if the woman and her unborn baby are entirely healthy. (Stenberg v. Carhart, 2000) Today's appeals court ruling was based entirely on the prior 5-4 Supreme Court decision, and it underscores the fact that the successor to Justice O'Connor will cast the deciding vote on whether the brutal partial-birth abortion method remains legal."


The Eighth Circuit ruling was in the case called Carhart v. Gonzales.


President Bush signed the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act on November 5, 2003, saying that in partial-birth abortion "a terrible form of violence has been directed against children who are inches from birth."


In a ruling issued in New York on August 26, 2004, U.S. District Judge Richard C. Casey said, "The Court finds that the testimony at trial and before Congress establishes that D&X [partial-birth abortion] is a gruesome, brutal, barbaric, and uncivilized medical procedure . . . [and finds] credible evidence that D&X abortions subject fetuses to severe pain." Nevertheless, Judge Casey also ruled that the federal ban was in conflict with the 5-4 Supreme Court decision in Stenberg. Casey's ruling is currently being reviewed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, while a third challenge to the law is before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Both the Second and Ninth Circuits are likely to hand down their rulings during the months just ahead, making the issue ripe for possible review by the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2005-2006 term.


[The Supreme Court is currently split 6 to 3 in favor of Roe v. Wade, requiring states to allow legal abortion for any reason up to "viability," and for "health" reasons (broadly defined) even during the final months of pregnancy. However, Justice Anthony Kennedy, a supporter of Roe, voted to uphold Nebraska's ban on the partial-birth abortion method. The Annenberg Center's FactCheck.org refuted the myth that the current Supreme Court is split 5 to 4 on Roe v. Wade, here.]


The National Right to Life Committee maintains the most comprehensive collection of documentation on partial-birth abortion available anywhere on the Internet, here.


For a good primer on what the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act does and does not do, and on other disputed issues pertaining to partial-birth abortion, see the memo "Partial-Birth Abortion: Misconceptions and Realities," here.


A collection of key documents pertinent to medical issues surrounding partial-birth abortion are posted here.


National Right to Life is the nation's largest pro-life organization, with 50 state affiliates and approximately 3,000 local affiliates nationwide. NRLC works through legislation and education to protect those threatened by abortion, infanticide, euthanasia, and assisted suicide.

0 Comments
 
Your Name:


Your Comment: